When it comes to climate change, the environmental movement has gotten itself on the wrong side of doubt. It has become the voice of the establishment, of the tenured, of the technocrats...It knows what is good for us, and its knowledge is backed up by the awesome power and majesty of the peer-review process. The political, cultural, business and scientific establishments stand firmly behind global warming today...They tell us it’s a sin to question the consensus, the sign of bad moral character to doubt.

Walter Russell Mead - The Greening of Godzilla

FAILED PREDICTIONS
• 1969 climate predictions miss by a mile
• IPCC says climate prediction impossible
• Scientists & science journalists - grow up
• The cult of the expert
• A bogus 21-year-old climate prediction
• We're always out-of-touch with the future
• The big picture: the Y2K lesson
• Climate psychics: 10-yr snow prediction fails
• Global disaster is so 1976
• We have heard this rhetoric before
• Predicting the future: zero visibility possible

THE MEDIA: BETRAYING THE PUBLIC TRUST
• Climate bible's new authors announced
• Scientists & science journalists - grow up
• The activists, the poll & the data
• How many IPCC scientists say so?
• The media, Mother Nature and oil spills
• Shielding climate orthodoxy from free speech
• IPCC falls for press release masquerade
• Earth Day and the media
• Let there be no more scientific consensuses
• Reuters' climate change fiction
• The cult of the expert
• Just 1 cotton-pickin' minute: newspaper's U-turn
• Systemic failure: invasion of the drama queens
• What she said re...climate bible 3 months ago
• Time magazine's controversial glacier expert
• Climate psychics: 10-yr snow prediction fails
• Science says: hop on one foot
• Al Gore: not this thinking woman's thinking man
• Bias: How the Media Distort the News
• Did IQs drop sharply?
• That's it, I've had it

THE NOBEL-WINNING IPCC CLIMATE BIBLE
• See you in mid-August (IPCC review links)
• Climate bible's new authors announced
• Cross-examining the IPCC
• How many IPCC scientists say so?
• Sudan fights climate change for the IPCC
• We trusted too completely
• More IPCC mischief
• IPCC cites an unpublished journal 39 times
• Cutoff dates, what cutoff dates?
• Citizen Audit report is now a PDF
• IPCC snowed by snowmobile lobby
• Press release masquerade - Part 2
• IPCC falls for press release masquerade
• What the IPCC learned from press releases
• The Stern Review scandal
• Dr. Pachauri, call your office
• A seasoned veteran's view of the IPCC
• IPCC reliance on grey literature 30 times
greater than UK threshold
• What's left if we disregard non-peer-reviewed claims?
• The water cannon of the climate debate
• Climate bible gets 21 'F's on report card
• Does the IPCC prefer grey lit to peer-reviewed?
• Who's concerned about the climate report?
• Help audit the UN climate report
• The great peer-review fairy tale
• Almost half non-peer-reviewed
• The climate bible and the home inspector
• Scientists' opinions are sometimes irrelevant
• Yes Virginia, the climate bible...news clippings
• What she said re: climate bible 3 months ago
• Greenpeace & the Nobel-winning climate report
• More dodgy citations in the...IPCC report